Although it appears that Obama may be dumping the public option (for now) many of his supporters both in and out of government are still pushing for a taxpayer funded public option. Allegedly this public option would be a Government Sponsored Enterprise, after the fashion of such success stories as FNME or FDMC. It is called "alleged" because no part of the upcoming healthcare bill that will eventually be voted on by either the House or the Senate has actually been finalized.
On a libertarian internet site (probably on Lew Rockwell but the original reference cannot be located), someone suggested that he would support the public option – including a 15% tax increase - in exchange for the private option actually being private.
The private system would be completely private. It would not be regulated in any way. It would be free of all FDA regulations, DEA regulations, and medical licensing. Anybody can be a healthcare practitioner, and can prescribe any medication. But any prescription would be considered nothing more than advice since no medications would be controlled.
So as an experiment, this idea was run by several supporters of socialist medicine.
Theoretically there should be no reason for them to oppose it. They get everything they allegedly want - full government run medicine with all the controls, paid for by those who do not want government medicine. They get free healthcare paid for by their opponents. They get all the controls they say people need. They get all the licencing, all the regulations, and all the restrictions they say people need. And they get to have those who prefer a private system pay for their public system.
The suggestion was greeted with horror.
For some reason, even though the suggestion gave them everything they say they want, they didn't want it.
They were obsessed with the question of how someone in the private system would know which medicines to take. It was suggested that people in the private system would go to any fraud who claims to be a doctor, and only wanted the medicinal freedom in order to "pop pills". Such arguments would indicate that advocates of socialist medicine need the government to prevent them from going to frauds and would need the government in order to not "pop pills".
It seems that the argument in favor of Socialist medicine is more than simply an attempt by the advocates of that system to have "free" healthcare. There is for some strange reason a desire to ensure that everyone else is in a controlled and regulated system as well, a desire to control and regulate everyone else.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Every week or so I eyeball my militia gear and ask myself, "Is it time yet?".
Of course they're horrified, Ayn. The problem in their eyes is that somebody would fail to take the necessary steps to save themselves from a preventable disease. Progressives would then have to watch them die of that disease, and that would break their little hearts, it would. To avoid feeling bad, they would feel obliged to pay for our health care.
So, to avoid feeling bad, and thus having to pay for our health care, they're going to avoid that problem completely by forcing us to buy health care.
Post a Comment